10+ PostgreSQL Alternatives and Competitors
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL is an advanced open-source database management software for all businesses. For more than two decades now, PostgreSQL offers superb tools that companies can fully utilize for their daily operations. With only a small group of people (68 employees), they quietly built themselves since it started running in 1996. The leadership of their CEO, Christophe Pettus and a few key personnel, namely Dave Cramer (Senior Data Architect), David Fetter (Senior DBA), and Jun Kuwamura, certainly helped with its success.
Now, PostgreSQL earns about $31.2 million per year from more than 2,000 active users. This only proves how robust PostgreSQL is as a software platform. However, since it is not alone in the industry of database management, it is best to know of its competitors. Such platforms include Oracle RDBMS, Knack, Amazon Aurora, Microsoft SQL Server, Improvado, MongoDB, MySQL, Teradata, and more. Learn more about these companies and how each one can benefit you when you scroll down now.
Alternatives
| Logo | Name Sort | Rating Sort | CEO | Pricing Sort | Founded Sort | Revenue Sort | Employees Sort | Location Sort | Reviews Sort | Customers Sort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Oracle RDBMS | Safra Catz | N/A | 1977 | $39.5 B | 136,000+ | Redwood City | 1000+ Reviews | 430K + | |
 | Knack | Samyr Qureshi | $39 | 2010 | $44.1 M | 460+ | San Francisco | 4000+ Reviews | 2.6K + | |
 | Amazon Aurora | Chris Urmson | $0.10 | 2014 | N/A | 10,000+ | Seattle | 3000+ Reviews | 250K + | |
 | Microsoft SQL Server | Satya Nadella | $931 | 1989 | N/A | 5,000+ | Colorado | 3500+ Reviews | 229.1K + | |
| PostgreSQL | Christophe Pettus | N/A | 1996 | $31.2 M | 68+ | Mexico | 1200+ Reviews | 2K + | |
 | Improvado | Daniel Kravtsov | $100 | 2017 | $3 M | 50+ | San Francisco | 3000+ Reviews | N/A | |
 | MongoDB | Dev Ittycheria | N/A | 2007 | $540.5 M | 1,000+ | New York | 2000+ Reviews | 18.4K + | |
 | MySQL | Marten Mickos | N/A | 1994 | $5.4 M | 400+ | California | 2000+ Reviews | N/A | |
 | Solarwinds | Kevin B. Thompson | $1615 | 1999 | $1 B | 2,500+ | Austin | 3000+ Reviews | 300K + | |
 | Teradata | Victor L Lund | $1.83 | 1979 | $2.2 B | 10,152+ | San Diego | 2500+ Reviews | 2.6K + |
Contact Info
| Website | postgresql.org | twitter.com/postgresql | facebook.com/groups/134695436611709 | linkedin.com/company/postgresql |
|---|
Key Employees
| Image | Name | Designation | |
|---|---|---|---|
 | Dave Cramer | Senior Data Architect | https://ca.linkedin.com/in/cramerdave |
 | David Fetter | Senior DBA | https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidfetter |
 | Jun Kuwamura |
Reviews
“ The database everyone should be using ”
- It is very complete for any type of project or application. It is stable, easy to use and can handle a lot of structured data. It is free software and is very well documented It is very popular and has a very varied community around the project
- This is a very powerful database and it is very fast. If you want your backend to be an RDB then you should surely use PostgreSQL
- Its installation and configuration can be a bit complex at first. Being free they are not obliged to provide support Requires specific tuning for each possible scenario
- Will sit on top of port 8080 permanently as far as it is in your system preventing you from easily using some stock Vagrant config that uses it.
“ The right database for 95% of use cases ”
- PostgreSQL is a great and powerful database system, used in the management of object-related databases, bringing great performances on concurrency, transactions, and schema controls.
- So you can find great extensions to help you with whatever you need. It uses MVCC (Multi-Version Concurrency Control) to ensure that the data you provide is consistent.
- Sometimes the connection to the database drops (internal server error 500), and it is necessary to connect again. When the query has many records, the data return is slow.
- When I have problems or errors with this manager, there is not much documentation to be able to solve the problems and this gives me delays when it comes to working.
“ Very complete and stable database ”
- It’s great that you can store databases that contain a huge amount of information, to feel confident because the software is very secure, great scalability.
- We use PostgreSQL as our system database for the software we develop, we find it reliable, robust and with great performance, we use both PHP and C++ to access the dataabse.
- There isn’t many thing to say about PosgreSQL, I will say that the most traumatic part is the installation but once you have it up and running this should be a walk in the park for a developer to use.
- And that makes it somewhat discredited when planning an application.
Features
- Access Control
- Analytics
- API
- Accounting Intergration
- Agile Software Development
- Application Integration
- Assessment Management
- Assignment Management
- CRM Integration
- Campaign Management
- Campaign Scheduling
- Collaboration Tools
- Collaborative Workspace
- Security
- Team Collaboration
Images & Videos
Q & A
The distinctive difference between MySQL and PostgreSQL is their architectural system. MySQL is programmed as a relational database management system whereas, PostgresSQL is an object-relational database management system. In terms of its OS capacity, PostgreSQL is supported by Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, and BSD. On the other hand, MySQL is supported by the same operating system except that it is also supported by BSD, UNIX, z/OS, Symbian, AmigaOS.
PostgreSQL is distributed under a license similar to BSD and meets 150 mandatory features required for compliance. It means that users can freely configure the platform without worrying much about their system’s safety.
Luckily, PostgreSQL is an entirely free database platform that one can opt to. Since PostgreSQL is free and the complete source code is available, users can get to enjoy advanced open-source relational databases with no limitations.
Although PostgreSQL is regarded as one of the best platforms for relational databases, the platform has a downside remark on its difficulty to use. Especially for first-time users, the application might be a complex platform to configure, particularly on its documentation.