10+ Microsoft SQL Server Alternatives and Competitors
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server is an extensive database management platform with business intelligence or BI capabilities. Since it is a product from the number one software company in the world, you already know that it is going to be a superb software. And the numbers show it. Since its foundation in 1989, Microsoft SQL Server now has more than 5,000 employees, over 229,100 active customers, and 3,000 or more online reviews. Therefore, it is not only one of the most used apps in the industry, but it is also one of the most reviewed. This is thanks to Satya Nadella, the company’s CEO.
However, seeing as though Microsoft SQL Server already costs $931 per month with only their Basic plan, it is not an ideal solution for small businesses. For that, you can look at its alternatives. Microsoft SQL Server’s fierce competitors include Oracle RDBMS, Knack, Amazon Aurora, PostgreSQL, Improvado, MongoDB, MySQL, Solarwinds, Teradata, and IBM DB2. Learn more about these companies when you scroll down this page.
Alternatives
| Logo | Name Sort | Rating Sort | CEO | Pricing Sort | Founded Sort | Revenue Sort | Employees Sort | Location Sort | Reviews Sort | Customers Sort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Oracle RDBMS | Safra Catz | N/A | 1977 | $39.5 B | 136,000+ | Redwood City | 1000+ Reviews | 430K + | |
 | Knack | Samyr Qureshi | $39 | 2010 | $44.1 M | 460+ | San Francisco | 4000+ Reviews | 2.6K + | |
 | Amazon Aurora | Chris Urmson | $0.10 | 2014 | N/A | 10,000+ | Seattle | 3000+ Reviews | 250K + | |
| Microsoft SQL Server | Satya Nadella | $931 | 1989 | N/A | 5,000+ | Colorado | 3500+ Reviews | 229.1K + | |
 | PostgreSQL | Christophe Pettus | N/A | 1996 | $31.2 M | 68+ | Mexico | 1200+ Reviews | 2K + | |
 | Improvado | Daniel Kravtsov | $100 | 2017 | $3 M | 50+ | San Francisco | 3000+ Reviews | N/A | |
 | MongoDB | Dev Ittycheria | N/A | 2007 | $540.5 M | 1,000+ | New York | 2000+ Reviews | 18.4K + | |
 | MySQL | Marten Mickos | N/A | 1994 | $5.4 M | 400+ | California | 2000+ Reviews | N/A | |
 | Solarwinds | Kevin B. Thompson | $1615 | 1999 | $1 B | 2,500+ | Austin | 3000+ Reviews | 300K + | |
 | Teradata | Victor L Lund | $1.83 | 1979 | $2.2 B | 10,152+ | San Diego | 2500+ Reviews | 2.6K + |
Contact Info
| Website | microsoft.com/en-in/sql-server | twitter.com/SQLServer | facebook.com/sqlserver | linkedin.com/company/microsoft-cloud-platform |
|---|
Pricing
Reviews
“ SQL is getting better as it grows older ”
- It’s trusted, reliable, and it’s not going anywhere. And now combined with Azure we have been taking our databases off of our physical servers and moving them to the cloud with so much ease.
- I pretty enjoy working with it and pretty recommend it. For years, the companies where I have been working relied on SQL Server and my observation is that it proves its expectations very good.
- Pricing is quite confusing and costly, and performance can be sluggish at times when dealing with low RAM.
- Installation of all the features can be a pain. Making sure you have the engine, agent, management studio can be confusing and often come in separate download packages.
“ Easy and Fast for Development ”
- Installation of all the features can be a pain. Making sure you have the engine, agent, management studio can be confusing and often come in separate download packages.
- My experience with SQL server has been fantastic, it afforded me the opportunity to query and work with large dataset. Been 7 months into database, and it has been great.
- There is nothing to complain about this product. Sometimes my server connectivity goes disconnect time to time, this could be the default functionality maybe but I find it disturbing.
- We are using it for mostly all applications and we need to keep updated with it to avoid problems with the application.
“ Data Management made so easy with MS SQL Server ”
- SQL Server is a great system to develop databases with great functionalities like jobs, procedures, functions ans so one
- Operating system licensing is always an additional cost. What I like most about SQL for Linux is the possibility to reduce this cost drastically, with an amazing OS and extremely stable SQL in this environment. Adjusting the environment variables for SQL is a differentiator.
- For me the only think not so good is performance for bigger batabases, but for me between 10GiB and 15GiB works fine
- The lack of reporting services is a terrible shortage. It could have an alternative in Apache, or even allow integration with Windows servers for this demand.
Features
- Access Control
- Analytics
- API
- Accounting Intergration
- Application Integration
- Agile Software Development
- Assessment Management
- Automated Billing
- Billable Hours Tracking
- Business Intelligence
- Campaign Analysis
- CRM Integration
- Campaign Planning
- Security
- Team Collaboration
Images & Videos
Q & A
Although Microsoft SQL is not entirely free, the platform still does offer free access to its users. If you’re one of those who aim for free access, you can utilize Microsoft SQL Server Express. Microsoft SQL Server Express is a version of Microsoft’s SQL Server that is free to download and use, so check them out.
Microsoft SQL provides three main subscription plans to its users; the enterprise edition, standard per core, and standard server + CAL. For an estimated retail price, enterprise edition would cost at around $14,256, then the standard per core would cost at $3,717, followed by standard server + CAL, which costs at $931. v
With more than 151,178+ companies that use Microsoft SQL Server, there’s no question of how popular this software is nowadays. With companies like TwentyEighty, Inc., Focus Pointe Global, Korman Communities, Inc., and more who have switched to Microsoft SQL, you can also take part in this growing community by having this platform as your main database management solution.
When we talk about the performance capacity, no question that MySQL tops against Microsoft SQL. However, what makes Microsoft SQL stand out against My SQL is its data recovery mechanism.