10+ Amazon Aurora Alternatives and Competitors
Amazon Aurora
Amazon Aurora as an app is a comprehensive database solution powered by robust data-driven analytics. As a business, Amazon Aurora is currently one of the best in the industry. Amazon Aurora was only recently made available in 2014. However, they built a robust corporation that centers around total customer satisfaction. On top of that, they now have over 10,000 employees, working full-time to deliver superb products and services. On the helm is company CEO, Chris Umson, and with a few key employees – namely Frank Boosman (Business Developer), Don Drake (Sr. Solutions Architect), and John Combs (Business Operations). Each of these vital personnel all worked to create what Amazon Aurora is today – a successful corporation.
As of this moment, Amazon Aurora has more 250,000 customers along with over 3,000 online reviews. These make it one of the most used platforms when it comes to database management. However, it is important to know that Amazon Aurora also has topnotch competition. These include Oracle RDBMS, Knack, Teradata, MySQL, MongoDB, Improvado, and many more. If you want to know more, scroll down now.
Alternatives
| Logo | Name Sort | Rating Sort | CEO | Pricing Sort | Founded Sort | Revenue Sort | Employees Sort | Location Sort | Reviews Sort | Customers Sort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Oracle RDBMS | Safra Catz | N/A | 1977 | $39.5 B | 136,000+ | Redwood City | 1000+ Reviews | 430K + | |
 | Knack | Samyr Qureshi | $39 | 2010 | $44.1 M | 460+ | San Francisco | 4000+ Reviews | 2.6K + | |
| Amazon Aurora | Chris Urmson | $0.10 | 2014 | N/A | 10,000+ | Seattle | 3000+ Reviews | 250K + | |
 | Microsoft SQL Server | Satya Nadella | $931 | 1989 | N/A | 5,000+ | Colorado | 3500+ Reviews | 229.1K + | |
 | PostgreSQL | Christophe Pettus | N/A | 1996 | $31.2 M | 68+ | Mexico | 1200+ Reviews | 2K + | |
 | Improvado | Daniel Kravtsov | $100 | 2017 | $3 M | 50+ | San Francisco | 3000+ Reviews | N/A | |
 | MongoDB | Dev Ittycheria | N/A | 2007 | $540.5 M | 1,000+ | New York | 2000+ Reviews | 18.4K + | |
 | MySQL | Marten Mickos | N/A | 1994 | $5.4 M | 400+ | California | 2000+ Reviews | N/A | |
 | Solarwinds | Kevin B. Thompson | $1615 | 1999 | $1 B | 2,500+ | Austin | 3000+ Reviews | 300K + | |
 | Teradata | Victor L Lund | $1.83 | 1979 | $2.2 B | 10,152+ | San Diego | 2500+ Reviews | 2.6K + |
Contact Info
| Website | Phone | aws.amazon.com/rds/aurora | (303) 371-8193. | twitter.com/awscloud | facebook.com/amazonwebservices | linkedin.com/company/amazon-web-services |
|---|
Pricing
Key Employees
| Image | Name | Designation | |
|---|---|---|---|
 | Frank Boosman | Business developer | https://www.linkedin.com/in/fboosman |
 | Don Drake | Sr. Solutions Architect | https://www.linkedin.com/in/don-drake-3631 |
 | John Combs | Business Operations | https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnmcombs |
Reviews
“ Amazon Aurora is the database to lookout for in the future ”
- It is a high performance and low latency database. You can also be assured of the high-availability of the database and the services hosted.
- The Security provided by Amazon is again top notch because all of the data is encrypted and secured. The customers feel much more relaxed and assured when the project is using Amazon Aurora to host their services.
- It suffers from Clod start which is a very well known aspect of the product. But the recovery part is also not up to the mark. They need to improve on the ability to restore a copy of the backup, but mostly it is seen that the copy is corrupted or not the latest one.
- It does allow us to add new nodes to the existing cluster but we need to be wary of that the new nodes are read-only nodes. All the functions of write/update will still be carried out by the master node only.
“ Old Database New Again: AWS Aurora, and it Shines ”
- Easy scaling – can be either horizontal and/or vertical.
- Nearly seamless backups, easy management.
- The Small and Medium instances are only good for testing or development, the number of connections and resources is limited.
- Some odd or sub-optimal configuration values with some parameters not changeable.
“ Extremely handy, well integrated and easy to use ”
- Optimized storage type for intensive I/O operations.
- Continuous backups to S3.
- Even though you are only billed per second of usage, there is a minimum of 5 minutes billed each time the database is active.
- For high load apps, Aurora Serverless is extremely expensive as compared to a single provisioned Aurora instance.
Features
- Access Control
- Analytics
- API
- Accounting Intergration
- Agile Software Development
- Assessment Management
- Assignment Management
- Business Intelligence
- CRM Integration
- Campaign Analysis
- Campaign Management
- Collaboration Tools
- Collaborative Workspace
- Customer Support
- Customization
Images & Videos
Q & A
Amazon Aurora offers a custom pricing to its users. However, in terms of standard pricing, Amazon Aurora would cost $0.10 per GB-month and $0.20 per 1 million requests.
Amazon Aurora has already established its popularity in delivering database management solutions to multiple companies for years. Through the years, several companies have been utilizing this software now, such as Acquia, Alert Logic, Akatsuki Inc., and Arizona State University, to name a few.
When it comes to using databases, Amazon Aurora is distributed via Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS is a web service running cloud-based programming that is designed to simplify the setup, operation, and scaling of a relational database for applications. Subsequently, Amazon Aurora allows its users to encrypt multiple databases through the AWS Key Management Service (KMS).
The primary difference between Amazon Aurora and RDS is that Amazon Aurora supports two kinds of replicas, while RDS allows only five replicas. Also, one of the Amazon Aurora and RDS’s distinctive differences is their replication processes. Amazon Aurora’s replication process is relatively faster compared to RDS.